Insights

Discover the news shaping the future of carbon removal.

Stay up to date on all things Klimate, carbon removal, and the most important emerging news and policy. Read our latest Insights.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Company strategy
all

Raising the bar: Klimate's updated due diligence

September 30, 2024
·
4 min

Staying ahead of the curve.

The newest version of Klimate’s Due Diligence expands on the previous iterations primarily by allowing us to gather more and better quality information. As we push for greater transparency and higher quality of data, this led us to ask more tailored and specific questions, for example, to individual methods.

Carbon removal is a rapidly changing market. Not just in regulatory terms, but the space as a whole, with new technology, certifications, and actors forming all the time. Best practices evolve to reflect new challenges, as shown by the revision of the Oxford Offsetting Principles, which highlights the need for ongoing strategy reviews (notably in Principle 1). We meet these expectations through continual reassessment and realignment to stay ahead of any challenges that may rise out of gaps in the market, thereby creating the market of the future.


Quality over quantity.

We’ve always worked to have the most stringent analysis and put a lot of effort into leading the market in that way. By releasing this new DD, we are adding on to, rather than discounting, it. Our core DD process remains the same and builds on previous strengths:

  • Setting a high bar. It contains compulsory questions and minimum standards. These have been increased, for example requiring internal governance, setting higher expectations for projects to rise to.
  • Finding the right projects for our clients. We pride ourselves on having the best projects rather than prioritising quantity. This process of data collections allows us to know the projects well, and better match projects with clients wants and needs.
  • Strong market position. We develop relationships throughout the process. Not only can we get better insight on the actual impact taking place, we curate important relationships with key players in the market, setting us up for better access.



What happens to the scores of already approved projects?

Through raising the bar and setting higher standards for our projects, we understand that this may result in lower scores. We see this as a good thing, as in this changing legislative arena, we need to not just keep up to date, but remain ahead of the curve. In doing so, we mitigate risk of investment for our clients and ensure impact for their investment.

As the market continues to remain under scrutiny, we’re taking an offensive approach to better assess risk. We want to make sure that we work with suppliers that have suitably identified risks and put mitigation measured in place. Part of this is asking better questions, seeking specific data points based on specific methodologies and their related challenges. We recognise that no method is perfect and we’re in a nascent space, which is why we take the initiative to evolve ahead of the curve.


Tracking key changes in our analysis.

To ensure that our due diligence process remains thorough and aligned with certification and legislation, we have updated our assessment on an annual basis. The team started by carrying out a review of the requirements within market standards (such as ICVCM), and certification bodies, as well as the data gathered within our competitors due diligence processes. This allowed us to conduct a gap analysis and ensure that our updated DD remains ahead of market expectations or at least equivalent to best practices.

Change in both total data points and by category over the years.

The graph above highlights how the number of data points we collect has increased each year, allowing us to gather more detailed information on projects across the 4 parameters we assess.

Launching this version of the due diligence involved the most extensive review we’ve done to date. Some of the changes we’ve implemented are:

  • Method specific questions
  • Significant increase in questions within Integrity category
  • Increased questions on biodiversity, climate adaptation, welfare and land use
  • Improved scoring process and approach to question weighting
  • Guidance for suppliers, to improve the efficiency of completing the assessment

These are just a few of the key measures we have put in place to raise the bar through our analysis.

While we are are still hard at work updating scores across all thirty-some projects, we thought now was the right time to let our community know about these changes.

How we get to gigatonne capacity

Scaling the carbon removal market to gigatonne capacity requires data transparency and trustworthy infrastructure. We pride ourselves on going above and beyond the expectations of integrity and quality in the market, and our due diligence is a key way to accomplish this. As this market develops, continual improvement is necessary to keep pushing for more. Continually raising the bar for carbon removal solutions is the only way we can achieve our common climate goals and solve the massive physical problem of the climate crisis at scale.

Company strategy
all

Net zero vs. carbon neutral: what's the difference?

August 22, 2024
·
6 min

What is the difference between carbon neutral and net zero?

Intuitively, it might seem like the terms ‘net zero’ and ‘carbon neutral’ mean the same thing. They are often (mistakenly) used interchangeably, when in reality they refer to different concepts.

Both net zero and carbon neutrality refer to a state where carbon emissions have been neutralised, and rely on the use of high-quality to varying degrees.

However, it is important to note that carbon neutrality does not put any limits on GHG emission outputs and requires a far higher capacity for offsetting, whereas net zero typically refers to more rigorous emissions reduction efforts, with the aim of achieving a future where few residual emissions exist. But, both rely on solid efforts to measure, understand, and take action on organisational GHG emissions.

What does it mean?

  • Net zero: Net zero refers to reducing all GHG emissions as much as possible – up to 90% – and tackling the remaining emissions with durable carbon removal.
  • Carbon neutral: Achieving carbon neutrality involves offsetting GHG emissions, focusing mainly on carbon dioxide emissions. More achievable in the short-term compared to net zero.

What kinds of emissions does it cover?

  • Net zero: Involves eliminating then offsetting all GHG emissions, including Scopes 1, 2, and 3 (the entire value chain).
  • Carbon neutral: Focuses on compensating for CO2 emissions through reduction or removal initiatives, typically covering Scopes 1 and 2 emissions.

How does it work?

  • Net zero: Requires a fundamental reduction in emissions through changes in technology, energy efficiency, and processes across all sectors and actively removing carbon from the atmosphere using technologies such as carbon capture and storage, or enhancing natural processes like afforestation and reforestation.
  • Carbon Neutral: Focuses on reducing carbon emissions and compensating for the remaining emissions through offsets.

What are the relevant standards and certifications?

  • Net zero: Science Based Targets Initiative's Net Zero Standard, Oxford Offsetting Principles for Net Zero Aligned Offsetting
  • Carbon neutral: PAS 2060

Carbon neutral vs net zero – which approach is better?

Net zero and carbon neutrality both have their strengths and weaknesses, and which approach is more appropriate depends on the circumstances of the individual case.

Below, we will take a closer look at the advantages and limitations of each approach.

Net zero: advantages and limitations

Advantages:

  • Comprehensive approach: Net zero encompasses all GHG emissions – not just carbon dioxide emissions. This makes it a more holistic approach to climate change mitigation.
  • Encourages innovation: Because it requires significant changes and innovations in technology, business practices, and lifestyle, net zero is a driving force for long-term sustainability. 
  • Aligns with climate goals: Net zero aligns closely with global climate goals – e.g. the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming to well below 2°C.

Limitations: 

  • Complexity and cost: Due to the need for systemic changes and potentially new technologies, achieving net zero is more complex and potentially more expensive than achieving carbon neutrality.
  • Longer time frame: Net zero often requires a longer timeline to achieve, as it involves significant reductions in emissions across all operations. 

Carbon neutrality: advantages and limitations

Advantages:

  • Feasibility: Carbon neutrality is often easier to achieve in the short term because it allows for offsetting emissions rather than requiring immediate and deep cuts in emissions.
  • Flexibility: Carbon neutrality provides flexibility for organisations that are unable to make drastic changes to their processes immediately.

Limitations:

  • Lacks guidance for reductions: Carbon neutrality does not give parameters for deep emission cuts. Thus, companies may rely heavily on low-quality offsets, which can sometimes be seen as a way to ‘buy’ environmental responsibility without making significant internal changes.
  • Potential for greenwashing: Due to its lack of a robust methodology, companies may be accused of greenwashing for relying on the cheapest, fastest way to neutrality without ‘doing the work.’ 

Which approach is better?

As mentioned above, the choice between net zero and carbon neutrality depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the entity considering them.

Net Zero:
Net zero is the preferred long-term commitment to sustainability that aligns with global climate targets, emphasising transparency and scientifically backed methodologies. It is best suited for organisations with the resources and capability to invest in innovative technologies and processes. Achieving net zero often carries a stronger public commitment, reflecting leadership in sustainability and enhancing brand reputation.

Carbon Neutral:
Carbon neutrality is a practical starting point for organisations, offering immediate, short-term reductions and valuable experience as long as genuine efforts are made. It is particularly suited for smaller entities or those with limited resources. While carbon neutrality still demonstrates responsibility and can positively impact public perception, it is increasingly seen as a stepping stone rather than a final goal.

However, carbon neutrality has fallen out of use as a claim due to anti-greenwashing regulations in the Nordics and EU. These policies such as the Green Claims Directive point to the weaknesses of carbon neutrality, including having no requirement for deep emission cuts or potentially incentivising the cheapest, quickest way to neutrality. This undermines integrity in offsetting and makes it more confusing for consumers to know what is a green product. Yet, aiming for neutrality is a great way to get started, gain experience alongside genuine efforts and pushes for transparency.

Why is reaching net zero so important?

Reaching net zero is crucial for several reasons. If global emissions continue unabated at current rates, we are set to exceed 2°C of global warming, with severe consequences for society and the environment.

The primary goal of reaching net zero is to limit global warming to well below 2°C, with efforts to limit the increase to 1.5°C. Achieving this goal is essential to prevent the most severe impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and loss of biodiversity.

Tackling this crisis requires a multi-pronged approach, beginning with emissions reductions across Scopes 1, 2, and 3 where relevant, followed by carbon removal via thoroughly vetted credits.

Carbon removal: A vital step on the road to net zero

Carbon removal technologies play a crucial role in achieving net zero emissions by actively removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. From afforestation to direct air capture, these technologies offer diverse pathways to sequester carbon and offset emissions.

Among other things, carbon removal:

  • Addresses residual emissions by capturing and storing an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere
  • Compensates for historical emissions that have accumulated over time
  • Enhances natural carbon sinks through practices like reforestation, afforestation, and improved land management
  • Bridges the transition to low-carbon economies by allowing time to develop and implement more sustainable technologies and practices

And much, much more.

Net zero targets have the potential to increase global carbon removal capacity, alongside reduction efforts. Multiple frameworks and certifications exist to guide and validate companies’ net zero claims. However, it’s crucial that companies do not overlook the need for high-integrity carbon removals alongside emission reduction.

Science
all

What is a life-cycle assessment (LCA)?

August 12, 2024
·
3 min

What is a life-cycle assessment?

A life-cycle assessment (LCA) – sometimes called a cradle-to-grave analysis – is a systematic review of all the environmental impacts associated with a product throughout its lifespan.

From raw material extraction through production, use, and disposal, an LCA covers every stage of a product’s life. This assessment helps to understand the overall environmental footprint and identify opportunities for improvement.

Some of the benefits of an LCA are:

  • Improved environmental awareness
  • Better decision making, driven by informed product design, policy making, and strategy development
  • Optimised sustainability efforts
  • Compliance with environmental regulations and standards

Knowing more about your environmental impact can benefit your company across the board. This is particularly the case for departments that are able to take immediate action based on an LCA, including marketing and sales, product development, supply chain management, and executive management.

Cradle-to-grave: the 5 stages of a product life cycle

There are five stages of a product life cycle in LCA:

  1. Raw material extraction
  2. Manufacturing and processing of raw materials
  3. Distribution and transportation of products
  4. Use and maintenance of products by consumers
  5. End-of-life (disposal or recycling of the product or its components)

The 4 phases of a life-cycle assessment

As defined in the ISO standard 14044, a life-cycle assessment consists of four key phases:

1. Definition of goal and scope

The first phase of an LCA is about defining the purpose of the study and its boundaries – in other words, what you want to analyse and how deep you want to go with your analysis.

This involves answering the following questions:

  • What are you assessing? Define your functional unit (e.g. 1 kg of product) to standardise comparisons.
  • What is the purpose of the assessment? Are you looking to design greener products, do you want to have environmental information available, or is it about following regulations?
  • How extensive will your assessment be? Decide how much primary data you want to collect, and from which point on you will use secondary data.
  • Which guidelines and methods will you follow? For example, if you are looking to obtain certain environmental labels, you may need to follow industry-specific LCA standards.

2. Inventory analysis

Phase two, the inventory analysis, is the data collection phase of the life-cycle assessment. This phase involves quantifying the environmental inputs (raw materials, energy) and outputs (emissions, waste) of your product.

For each stage of the product’s life cycle, data must be collected on:

  • Raw materials
  • Energy
  • Water
  • Emissions to air, water, or land

3. Impact assessment

Phase three involves evaluating potential environmental impacts using data from phase two. An impact assessment, or life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA), typically includes:

  1. Selection of Impact Categories: Identify relevant environmental issues like global warming, ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity, and eco-toxicity.
  2. Classification: Assign LCI data (inputs and outputs) to the selected categories, e.g., CO2 emissions to global warming and NOₓ emissions to acidification.
  3. Characterisation: Quantify contributions to each category, converting different emissions into a common unit, like CO2 equivalents for global warming.
  4. Evaluation and Interpretation: Analyse results to identify significant impacts and prioritise improvements, considering assessment limitations and reliability.

4. Interpretation

In the final phase of an LCA, results must be interpreted to ensure they're clear and actionable. This process involves reviewing findings, making sure data is complete and consistent, and drawing meaningful conclusions. While you can interpret results as you go, the most reliable insights come from thoroughly analysed data.

Reaching Net Zero: beyond emission reduction

A life-cycle assessment offers a detailed view of a product’s environmental impact, guiding companies in making informed decisions to reduce these impacts. While reducing emissions is crucial for achieving net-zero goals, it's becoming clear that reduction alone may not suffice to meet the targets set by the Paris Agreement.

To truly reach net zero, companies must offset any remaining greenhouse gas emissions through effective carbon removal. Although this can be challenging, understanding and accessing reliable carbon removal options is key to meeting these climate commitments.

Science
all

What is carbon accounting, and how does it work?

July 30, 2024
·
5 min

What is carbon accounting?

Carbon accounting is an important subcategory of greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting. Specifically focusing on measuring and tracking carbon dioxide emissions, carbon accounting allows companies to quantify their emissions, understand their environmental impact, and set goals for reducing their carbon footprint.

The most commonly used approach to calculate carbon emissions – and all GHG emissions – is the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, which classifies emissions into three categories known as ‘Scopes’:

  • Scope 1: All emissions produced as a direct result of the company’s operations.
  • Scope 2: Indirect emissions resulting from the generation of electricity, heating, cool, etc. purchased and consumed by the company.
  • Scope 3: Indirect emissions that occur in the company’s supply chain as a consequence of the company’s activities, but from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company.

The goal of carbon accounting is to quantify the total carbon emissions that a company is responsible for – including emissions that are not produced directly in the company’s daily operations. Accounting for Scope 3 emissions can be particularly challenging, as companies must rely on getting accurate data from their suppliers.

Read more: What are Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions?

What is a carbon accountant?

A carbon accountant is a professional who specialises in measuring, tracking, and reporting a company’s carbon emissions. A carbon accountant typically has a background in environmental science, engineering, sustainability, or a related field.

In their work, carbon accountants support environmental sustainability efforts, strategic planning, and regulatory compliance. This makes them a crucial asset for companies looking to achieve net-zero emissions.

Find a carbon accounting partner here.

How does carbon accounting work?

Carbon accounting: two different approaches

Like GHG accounting, carbon accounting is done using two methods: the spend-based method and the activity-based method. As both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, the Greenhouse Protocol recommends a hybrid approach.

The spend-based method

The spend-based method uses emission factors that are expressed as emissions per unit of currency spent. The method takes the financial value of a given company purchase and multiplies it by the amount of carbon dioxide it emits. This approach is less accurate than the activity-based method, but also less time-consuming and easier to implement.

Advantages and disadvantages of this method include:

➕ Easy to implement if financial data is available

➕ Covers a wide range of activities with one set of financial data

➖ Less accurate due to the use of average emission factors rather than specific data

➖ Emission factors might not reflect the specific suppliers or products purchased by the organisation

The activity-based method

The activity-based method uses data to retrieve information on how many units of specific materials a company has purchased. The method accounts for all the steps in the process that may have created a carbon footprint, including material sourcing, production, marketing, and much more.

Advantages and disadvantages of this method include:

➕ Provides a more precise and accurate measurement of emissions for specific activities

➕ Enables companies to make targeted emission reduction strategies

➖ Requires more detailed data on activities and processes

➖ Can be complex and time consuming to implement, particularly for large companies with many different sources of emissions

Most companies follow the hybrid model, using all of the activity-based data possible and supplementing with spend-based methods to estimate the rest. This allows them to gain a more comprehensive understanding of emissions and simultaneously support more effective decision making.

Why is carbon accounting important?

By enabling companies to account for all emissions – including their indirect emissions – carbon accounting provides companies with a clearer understanding of their emission levels and a better foundation for setting realistic and achievable targets.

From carbon accounting to carbon removal

Carbon accounting is essential to the foundation of any corporate sustainability strategy. When it comes to achieving net zero, reducing your emissions is an important and necessary step in the right direction. However, there is growing consensus that reduction is no longer enough to stay within the goals set forward in the Paris Agreement. In order to stay on track for global climate targets, companies need to be neutralising their residual CO2 emissions with an equivalent amount of verified carbon removal.

Company strategy
all

The business case for carbon removal

June 25, 2024
·
3 min

It can be difficult to envision the long-term payoffs of investing in carbon removal today. However, the reality is that there are strong incentives to do so from both a financial and reputational perspective.

1. Gain first-mover advantage

In the carbon removal sector, early investors can gain strategic and competitive benefits by engaging in critical efforts to scale an industry that is vital to reaching net zero.

Secure access today and tomorrow

Supply of carbon removal solutions is currently limited, and this scarcity is projected to intensify as demand skyrockets. According to Bloomberg, carbon credit prices could increase fifty-fold by 2050, making it crucial for companies to secure access now and hedge against future constraints.

Investing in a diversified portfolio of carbon removal methods at different price points, with varying levels of permanence, can help companies shift towards more permanent carbon removal over time—enabling greater climate impact within the same budget.

Carbon Purchase Agreements (CPAs) offer another long-term strategy to secure high-quality carbon removal credits over time at a fixed price point, simplifying procurement and managing financial and delivery risks. Learn more about how a CPA works here.

Build a firm knowledge base and establish supplier relations

Early adopters in the carbon removal market gain valuable supplier relationships. By gaining insights in this emerging sector, businesses can ensure they are well-positioned as the market matures. Building a robust knowledge base and supplier network early on will help smooth out any roadblocks on your sustainability journey down the line.

2. Stand out as a climate leader

Investing in thoroughly vetted, high-quality carbon removal sends a strong signal to employees, customers and other stakeholders that you are taking sustainability seriously, while also protecting you from potential greenwashing claims.

Attract and retain top talent

Companies with strong environmental policies attract more employees. Contributing to sustainability and climate action is becoming an ever bigger consideration for career decisions. An IBM study found that 67% of employees are more willing to apply and 68% more likely to accept job offers from companies committed to sustainability.

Appeal to environmentally conscious customers

Consumer preferences are also shifting rapidly towards sustainability. A recent survey of over 1,000 US adults revealed striking evidence that two-thirds are willing to pay more for sustainable products (Sustainable Brands). Additionally, more companies are including carbon metrics in their RFPs to reduce their own environmental impact, creating opportunities for businesses that prioritise carbon removal.

Boost company valuation

Strong, well-defined net zero targets are an indication that a company is keeping stride with global trends and regulatory expectations. This proactive stance can significantly enhance investor confidence, as it demonstrates a commitment to sustainability and long-term risk management.

Companies with clear carbon reduction and removal strategies often enjoy a premium in the market because they are perceived as less vulnerable to future carbon pricing, policy changes, and resource constraints.

3. Future-proof your business

By investing in carbon removal now, companies can secure a competitive edge, attract talent and customers, and mitigate future regulatory risk.

Stay ahead of compliance and regulation

Governments worldwide are increasingly considering the integration of carbon removal credits into their emissions trading schemes. At the same time, new compliance reporting directives are coming into force, such as the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, and the US Security Exchange Commissions’s climate disclosure rules. These carbon reporting policies will only become more stringent in the years to come, as global net zero efforts continue to gain momentum. Staying ahead of these regulatory changes ensures that businesses are not caught off guard and can smoothly adapt to new compliance requirements.

Set a price on carbon and make informed decisions

Establishing an internal price on carbon helps companies evaluate investments, manage risks, and develop forward-thinking strategies. Taking a proactive approach to carbon pricing can significantly enhance a company’s ability to future-proof its operations and align with evolving market expectations.

Getting started with carbon removal

Theres is strong evidence that investing in carbon removal today not only addresses critical environmental challenges but also provides strategic business advantages.

There are some key steps that must be taken beforehand:

Company strategy
all

How to avoid greenwashing in the green claims era

June 12, 2024
·
4 min

In 2023, there was notable progress in the fight against greenwashing—particularly in the realm of offsetting, as stakeholders increasingly demanded genuine sustainability efforts from companies. Despite this advancement, uncertainty persists around what constitutes true sustainability, leading to challenges for companies in navigating their climate strategies.

What is greenwashing?

Greenwashing refers to making vague, misleading, or unsubstantiated claims regarding environmental progress. Some forms are more obvious than others and can occur in a number of ways such as:

  • Claiming environmental progress without concrete action plans
  • Being purposefully vague or using generic labels such as “green” or “eco friendly”
  • Emphasising a single environmental impact while ignoring other harmful environmental impacts
  • Implying that a minor improvement has a major impact on environmental performance

Avoiding greenwashing is one of the greatest perceived barriers to companies looking to meaningfully engage in a climate strategy. This threat often leads to hesitation or even "green-hushing" – the suppression of sustainability efforts due to fear of being accused of greenwashing. This in turn hampers the progress that sustainable leadership can achieve.

However, increased scrutiny of environmental claims is ultimately beneficial. Stricter standards for such claims can encourage wider adoption of environmentally responsible behaviours. It's clear that unsubstantiated claims of positive impact not only hinder climate mitigation efforts but also lead to overestimation. Furthermore, enhanced transparency and the delivery of high-quality action, data, and communication are essential pillars for a more sustainable future.

What does greenwashing have to do with offsetting?

Past offsetting practices allowed too many companies to make large claims to be made on the backs of less credible investments, leading to a loss of trust, major reputation damage, and sometimes even million-dollar lawsuits. These examples, highlighted in Bloomberg and The Guardian, primarily involved avoidance-based offsetting, where companies claimed carbon neutrality despite minimal to no actual environmental impact from the projects. This lack of return is not only detrimental to our common climate goals, but also damages trust in carbon markets, underscoring the importance of transparency and trust in the future of carbon removal markets.

Regulatory bodies continue to work to boost the credibility of environmental claims by combating greenwashing, particularly when it comes to offsetting.

There has been an increase in anti-greenwashing regulatory changes across Europe, such as the EU Green Claims Directive, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), and the UK’s reflective Green Claims Code. The US Federal Trade Commission and Security and Exchange Council has also adopted environmental reporting and claims directives that mention carbon removal. These are a clear indication of the direction the international climate claims landscape is heading.

Rather than viewing these directives as a mere disclosure and reporting activity, they have the potential to showcase a company’s commitment to climate transition planning, thereby incentivising action in deep decarbonisation and investment in carbon removal.

Challenge into opportunity: Green Claims Directive

The EU has made significant progress towards eradicating greenwashing. Most recently, by passing an act to ban misleading advertising practices and require verification and substantiation of environmental claims. Regulations like these can be invaluable assets, providing a clear blueprint and methodology for how to best communicate environmental claims.

The Green Claims directive provides helpful guardrails around making green claims based on offsetting. This is an important move towards ensuring the reliable use of offsets, for two key reasons:

  • Claims like carbon neutral, climate neutral, or climate positive lack consistent definitions and methodologies, bringing their validity and accuracy into question
  • Ambitious emission reductions alongside removals are the only way to reach a true net zero future

Best practices to avoid greenwashing in your climate strategy

While the regulatory landscape continues to develop, recognised supra-national bodies offer advice on best practices for sustainability communication. These include target-setting bodies, accounting standards, and even climate achievement certifications or ratings.

The bottom line: companies are not alone in navigating how to make a legitimate green claim. By aligning with best practice standards like the Oxford Offsetting Principles or Science Based Targets Initiative, companies can stay ahead of the regulatory curve and share their climate strategies with clarity and transparency. These standards also form the basis of strategy at Klimate.

Moreover, to avoid greenwashing, companies should shift focus from grand claims to providing clear and transparent information about their activities. It's crucial to honestly communicate both the positive and negative climate impacts of investments, as well as acknowledge the road ahead towards taking full environmental responsibility.

Wondering where to start? Not all companies are yet affected by one of the major regulatory directives, working with a target-setting organisation, or have a clearly defined strategy.

  • Create a claims framework with specific goals and KPIs, and set clear dos and don’ts.
  • Externally verify claims: not sure what something means, or what best practice calls for? Ask an expert and have your claims audited.
  • If all else fails, prioritise clarity and transparency.

Greenwashing to green progress

Avoiding greenwashing is crucial for maintaining brand trust and reputation. Being recognised as a leader in climate action will benefit your relationships with stakeholders, including employees, consumers, and investors, over the long term.

This relies on taking quality action and communicating with transparency—essential elements to transform this challenge into an opportunity for climate leadership. Ultimately, the recent increase in scrutiny—and corresponding opportunity to build brand trust—will enable more progress towards our common climate goals to secure a more sustainable future.

Science
all

What is GHG accounting, and how does it work?

May 30, 2024
·
6 min

What is GHG accounting?

Greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting refers to the process of measuring and monitoring the GHG emissions associated with a company or organisation. Using standardised measuring and reporting per agreed-upon protocols, companies are able to measure the quantity of GHG emissions resulting from their:

  • Direct emissions: Emissions produced by the company, such as emissions from on-site combustion or production processes.
  • Indirect emissions: Emissions resulting from the energy the company uses, the company’s supply chain, and the end-of-life stages of its products.

Greenhouse gas accounting helps to provide numerical data on greenhouse gas emissions. It provides companies with information which enables them to be held accountable for their emissions, making it possible for companies to take action when it comes to reducing their emissions.

What is the difference between GHG accounting and carbon accounting?

The term GHG accounting is often used interchangeably with carbon accounting, but the two are not completely synonymous.

GHG accounting encompasses all greenhouse gasses, including carbon dioxide. Carbon accounting is a subset of GHG accounting which specifically focuses on measuring and managing carbon dioxide emissions. This enables companies to more accurately account for all emissions within their value chain and serves as the foundation for crafting an impactful reduction and removal strategy.

Find a carbon accounting partner here.

How does GHG accounting work?

GHG accounting involves the following key steps:

  1. Identification: Identifying sources of emissions within the company. Examples of these include stationary combustion, transportation, and fugitive emissions.
  2. Calculation: Calculating emissions from each source using emission factors and activity data. To account for the different global warming potentials of various greenhouse gasses, emissions are typically reported in terms of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO₂e).
  3. Tracking and reporting: Recording and reporting emissions in accordance with established standards and protocols – e.g. the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, ISO 14064, or national regulations. This includes accounting for Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
  4. Verification and validation: Ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the data and methods used for GHG accounting. This is often done through external verification or audits.

Methods of GHG accounting

GHG accounting is done using two methods: the spend-based method and the activity-based method.

The spend-based method

The spend-based method uses emission factors that are expressed as emissions per unit of currency spent. The method works by multiplying the financial value of a company purchase by the amount of greenhouse gas and carbon dioxide it emits. This approach is easier and less time-consuming, but also less accurate than the activity-based method.

Advantages and disadvantages of the spend-based method include:

  • Easy to implement if financial data is available
  • Covers a wide range of activities with one set of financial data
  • Less accurate, as this method uses average emission factors rather than specific data
  • Emission factors might not reflect the specific suppliers or products purchased by the organisation

The activity-based method

The activity-based method uses data to retrieve information on how many units of specific materials have been purchased. The method accounts for all the steps in the process that may have created a carbon footprint. This includes material sourcing, production, marketing, and much more.

Advantages and disadvantages of the activity-based method include:

  • Provides a more precise and accurate measurement of emissions for specific activities
  • Allows for targeted emission reduction strategies
  • Requires more detailed data on activities and processes
  • Can be time consuming and complex to implement, especially for large companies with many different sources of emissions

As both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, many companies choose to use a hybrid approach, combining both methods to gain a more comprehensive understanding of emissions and support more effective decision making.

Why is GHG accounting important?

For companies striving to reach net-zero emissions, GHG accounting is important for numerous reasons. GHG accounting functions as a baseline measurement that provides companies with a clearer understanding of their emission levels – an essential factor for companies looking to set realistic and achievable net-zero targets.

Other reasons GHG accounting is an important element on the journey towards net zero include:

  • Monitoring progress: GHG accounting enables companies to monitor their progress on the road towards net zero. By tracking emissions, companies can assess the effectiveness of their strategies and make adjustments as needed.
  • Identifying reduction opportunities: By providing detailed information about emission sources, GHG accounting helps companies identify areas for improvement and opportunities for emission reduction – e.g. switching to renewable energy sources or improving energy efficiency.
  • Transparency and reporting: Accurate GHG accounting enables companies to transparently report their emissions and progress towards net zero to investors, customers, and other stakeholders, helping to build credibility and trust.
  • Compliance with regulations: GHG accounting helps companies comply with relevant regulations and reporting requirements surrounding greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Risk management: Understanding emissions and their potential impact helps companies manage climate-related risks. This can include adjusting business strategies and investments to account for customer preferences or future climate policies.
  • Access to sustainable financing: Accurate GHG accounting can help companies demonstrate their commitment to sustainability. This can help attract investors and financial institutions that favour companies with strong environmental performance.

The process of GHG accounting can also help drive companies to invest more in innovation within areas such as energy usage, supply chain management, and product design, moving towards a more sustainable future for companies across the globe.

Next steps

GHG accounting provides companies with a clearer understanding of their emission levels, allowing them to better focus their efforts towards the greatest reduction opportunities. When it comes to achieving net zero, reducing your emissions is an important and necessary step in the right direction. However, there is growing consensus that reduction is longer enough to stay within the goals set forward in The Paris Agreement. For a company to reach net zero, residual GHG emissions must be neutralised with an equivalent amount of carbon removal.

At Klimate.co, we provide access to high-quality, innovative, and verifiable carbon removal solutions. We strategically finance projects based on environmental responsibility as well as social and economic development – and we only work with companies that are already taking action to reduce their emissions.

Policy
all

What are Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions?

May 7, 2024
·
5 min

Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions: What are they, and what is their purpose?

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol – the world’s most widely used greenhouse gas accounting standard – categorises GHG emissions into three Scopes: 1, 2, and 3.

These three categories are used to classify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with a company’s activities, within both its own operations and its wider value chain.

By incorporating Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions in their full emissions inventory, companies are able to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of their full value chain emissions. This enables them to better focus their efforts towards the greatest reduction opportunities.

Definitions of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions

In essence, Scope 1 emissions are direct emissions owned and controlled by the company, whereas Scopes 2 and 3 are indirect emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. Whilst the company does not own or control the sources of Scope 2 and 3 emissions, these emissions still occur as a result of the company’s activities.

Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions are categorised as follows:

Scope 1 emissions

Scope 1 emissions are direct greenhouse gas emissions which occur from sources that are directly owned or controlled by the company. These include emissions from sources such as fuel combustion, company vehicles, and fugitive emissions.

Example: Scope 1 emissions occur from burning fuel in the company’s fleet of vehicles (provided these vehicles are not electrically powered).

Scope 2 emissions

Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions which occur as a result of the generation of electricity, heat, or steam that a company purchases or consumes. Scope 2 emissions occur at the facility where the energy is generated, but are still associated with the company’s activities.

Example: Scope 2 emissions are caused by the generation of the electricity used in the company’s buildings.

Scope 3 emissions

Scope 3 emissions are indirect emissions which occur as a result of the company’s activities, but from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. These include investments, purchased goods and services, business travel, employee commuting, waste disposal.

Scope 3 emissions include all emissions not covered in Scope 1 or 2, and which are created by the company’s value chain.

Example: Scope 3 emissions occur when the company buys, uses, and disposes of products from suppliers.

The role of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions in corporate sustainability

Understanding Scope 1, 2, and 3 is crucial for companies aiming to reduce their environmental impact and comply with global sustainability standards.

By understanding emissions across all Scopes, companies are able to comprehensively assess their environmental impact. This knowledge enables them to identify the most significant sources of emissions and develop targeted reduction strategies tailored to their specific operations and value chains. 

This is particularly important for companies aiming to achieve net-zero emissions. There are several reasons for this, which go beyond simply aligning with broader global sustainability goals.

These include:

  • Accounting for all emissions: Net zero means balancing the amount of GHG emissions released into the atmosphere with an equivalent amount of emissions removed or offset. To achieve this, companies must account for all emissions within their value chain. This can be achieved through carbon accounting, which is used to accurately estimate all three scopes and serves as the foundation for crafting an impactful reduction and removal strategy. Find a carbon accounting partner here.
  • Developing comprehensive reduction strategies: Reduction is essential on the road to net zero. Understanding emissions helps companies develop comprehensive reduction strategies that address both direct (Scope 1) and indirect (Scope 2 and 3) emissions.
  • Minimising residual emissions: Understanding Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions helps companies identify residual emissions that are challenging to eliminate entirely, but may be minimised through the right reduction and offsetting measures.
  • Enhancing transparency and credibility: Transparent reporting of emissions data demonstrates the company’s willingness to be accountable for all emissions associated with its operations and activities. This enhances the credibility of the company’s net-zero commitment, helping to build trust with stakeholders and investors.

You might also be interested in: What is GHG accounting, and how does it work?

Scope 3 emissions: How companies can make an impact

For many companies, Scope 3 emissions account for more than 70% of their carbon footprint. For example, the extraction and processing of raw materials often cause significant Scope 3 emissions for manufacturing companies.

Scope 3 emissions are typically more challenging to control, as many suppliers have considerable influence on how emissions are reduced through their own purchasing decisions. However, committing to tackling Scope 3 emissions is crucial for companies looking to achieve net zero emissions.

Addressing Scope 3 emissions can make a significant difference in advancing a company’s journey towards decarbonisation and corporate sustainability.

Getting started with carbon removal

Understanding emissions across all Scopes enables companies to comprehensively assess their environmental impact, identify the most significant sources of emissions, and develop targeted reduction strategies tailored to their specific operations and value chains.

When it comes to achieving net zero, reducing your emissions is an important and necessary step in the right direction. However, there is growing consensus that reduction is longer enough to stay within the goals set forward in The Paris Agreement. For your company to reach net zero, you must neutralise your residual GHG emissions with an equivalent amount of carbon removal.

At Klimate.co, we provide access to high-quality, innovative, and verifiable carbon removal solutions. We strategically finance projects based on environmental responsibility as well as social and economic development – and we only work with companies that are taking action to reduce their emissions.

Company strategy
all

What is a Carbon Purchase Agreement?

April 24, 2024
·
5 min

Your Net Zero commitment, guaranteed

A Carbon Purchase Agreement (CPA) is a contract entered between a carbon removal supplier or broker (in this case Klimate) and a client, that guarantees future access to Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) credits.

The purpose is to guarantee that the Purchaser has access to carbon removal in the future - at a given price, volume and type - while ensuring the quality, credibility and additionality of the CDR credits.

How a Carbon Purchase Agreement works

Planning

Ambitious companies with Net Zero commitments sign on to CPAs to aggregate demand. By signing CPAs, companies secure their access to high-quality CDR projects that will not be available in the future. By grouping together projects, companies can create sufficient demand to ensure development at a cost-efficient scale and guarantee additionality.

Execution

Project suppliers use the CPA to build new CDR facilities. With demand secured, Klimate collaborates with suppliers to secure working capital and deploy CDR facilities. We use our robust and proprietary analytical framework to ensure that only the highest quality projects are supported.

Delivery

CDR credits with true additionality. As the CDR projects begin delivery, purchasers pay for credits, registered on the public records of Klimate. The cost is fixed, as opposed to the market price, expected to increase significantly in the coming years due to supply shortages.

Why CPAs are critical to delivering Net Zero commitments

The science is clear—all viable climate models show that carbon removal will be necessary to achieve the targets set by the Paris Agreement and reach global Net Zero by 2050. Companies need to reduce their emissions as much as possible, but unavoidable emissions must still be addressed through CDR. A Carbon Purchase Agreement can help your business meet future decarbonisation targets

Securing access, affordability and additionality through CPAs

  • There is already a significant shortage of supply for high-quality carbon removal. The cost of CDR is also expected to accelerate as demand rapidly outpaces supply. By committing early, you fix the future cost, while paying the full amount only at the successful delivery of the CDR credits.
  • Additionality is the holy grail of offsetting emissions. By co-initiating new carbon removal projects, CPAs become unquestionably additional.
  • CPAs also help accelerate the overall development of the carbon removal market, by sending a market signal that prompts other companies to invest as well. In the long run
  • Leading companies like Meta, Google, Stripe and McKinsey are already pre-committing to purchase CDR towards 2030.

Key terms

  1. Method - There are many ways to remove CO₂, each CPA specifies which method will be used.
  2. Volume CO₂ / Year - Each CPA holds a certain amount of CO₂ that can be produced per year.
  3. Cost / Ton - The cost for each CDR credit, typically 1 ton CO₂.
  4. Delivery schedule - The time period and volumes in which the CDR credits will be delivered. For example 2025 to 2030.
  5. Pre-commitment - The share of the total amount which needs to be committed at the start of the contract.

A Carbon Purchase Agreement for your company

Curious about how a Carbon Purchase Agreement might fit into your overall sustainability strategy? Speak to a carbon removal strategist to learn more about how you can achieve climate impact while making sound business decisions.

Company strategy
all

B Corp Month

March 24, 2024
·
3 min

What is a B Corp Certification?

B Corp is an independent certification that verifies high levels of social and environmental performance.

It is issued by the non-profit network B Lab, and is available to companies of all sizes worldwide provided they are able to demonstrate the following:

  1. A B Corp Impact Assessment score of 80 or more. This score reflects a measure of the company’s entire social and environmental impact.
  2. A legally binding commitment to being held accountable by all stakeholders, not just shareholders.
  3. Demonstrate full transparency by making a breakdown of their alignment with B Corp standards publicly available on the B Lab website.

Klimate’s journey to B Corp certification

The key values of B Corporation’s are highly aligned with Klimate’s mission–sustainability, transparency, and doing more good in the world around us. As a company founded to fight climate change through high quality carbon removal solutions, joining the network of certified B Corporations was a must.

Looking to the future, our focus remains on continual improvement and development of these goals. Our journey involves not only scaling the carbon removal industry but also ensuring that combating climate change remains an activity that benefits all people and life on this planet.

Klimate founder team. From the left Mads Emil Dalsgaard, Katja Grothe-Eberhardt, and Simon Bager

As part of B Corp Month, we were asked to consider how we can “B the change” for the future, and look towards the goals we want to achieve in 2025:

"In 2025, our mission as a carbon removal asset manager is to facilitate the removal of over 1 million tonnes of CO2, elevating our impact to the megaton scale. With an unwavering commitment to integrity and impact, our goal goes beyond quantity; we strive to push forward high-quality projects and enhance the percentage of permanent carbon removal delivered to the market. Through strategic collaborations with clients and suppliers, we bring trust, transparency and scale to the nascent carbon removal market, helping companies meet net zero targets and mitigating global climate change."

Simon Bager, Co-Founder and Chief Impact Office, Klimate

Demonstrating Klimate's impact beyond climate action

Joining the global B Corp network is a valuable opportunity to align with a broader movement that aims to uplift people as well as protecting the planet. Klimate’s agenda for sustainability and inclusivity aligns closely with B Lab’s core principles, which include:

  • Championing the principles of justice, equality, diversity and includion (JEDI)
  • Valuing and prioritising all stakeholders affected by our decisions–not only company shareholders.
  • Taking action towards the global Sustainable Development Goals

Closer to home, we are excited to be an active member of the B Corp Nordics group, which brings creative minds from various industries together to discuss new ways to operate sustainable businesses.

“We are extremely happy to receive B Corp Certification™ in Klimate. It has been an important milestone for us, ever since the launch of our business, and we are now excited to join this forward-looking group of companies. We want to always strive for more, and the community that B Corp provides, with the most ambitious sustainable businesses, is a unique space for sparring. Late last year, we participated in one of the first ever B Corp CEO dinners, and it was incredibly inspiring to listen to and share experiences with becoming more aware as a company.”

Katja Eberhardt, Co-Founder and CEO, Klimate

Looking ahead: Community and Collaboration

Becoming a Certified B Corporation marks a significant milestone and the start of a new chapter in Klimate's journey. We recognise that a systemic shift towards decarbonisation has to be a community effort, and we are delighted to be part of a community as dynamic as the B Corp network, alongside many of our clients and partners.

We look forward to working with like-minded individuals and organisations that drive positive change to build a more sustainable future together. If you would like to learn more about how carbon management can add to your environmental performance as a B Corp, or explore opportunities for collaboration with Klimate, reach out and speak to one of our experts here.

Stay in touch

Sign up for Klimate Insights

Stay in the loop on all things Klimate, carbon removal, and the most important emerging news and policy.

Got it! You're on the list. Check your inbox for a confirmation from us.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.