The net zero toolkit with Tobias Sørensen | What goes up must come down, Episode 8
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) isn’t a “nice-to-have”—it’s a climate necessity. In the latest podcast episode, Simon sat down with Tobias Johan Samson from Concito to unpack the climate-benefit-to-cost ratio of different carbon strategies. They discuss the merits of storing captured CO₂ underground versus utilisation for synthetic aviation fuels (e-fuels), and how to prioritise pathways for an effective net zero strategy. The conversation also dives into public subsidy schemes, the viability of different CCS/CDR sources, and the latest on Nordic CO₂ storage infrastructure. In this episode, Simon and Tobias explore what truly delivers the biggest climate benefit—and how we can spend climate finance wisely.

TL;DR - key points from the episode.
- Captured CO₂ has multiple uses and multiple pathways worth considering.
- Comparing two pathways, e-fuels and permanent storage (like BECCs & DAC), storage is likely more cost competitive and brings greater benefits.
- Storage breakthroughs in the Nordics build a strong foundation for a cost-competitive future.
- The voluntary market can help build out the infrastructure alongside state-tenders. Still, policy intervention is necessary to scale.
Comparing optimal technology pathways: e-fuels, storage, and aviation
What’s the smartest way to use CO₂ to reach net zero? Tobias shares insights from a recent analysis showing that storing CO₂ is more cost-effective and scalable than converting it into e-fuels. E-fuels, made from green hydrogen and captured CO₂, are promoted as sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). But according to the report, Direct Air Capture with Storage (DACCS) delivers the same climate benefit with lower energy use and cost. Since CO₂ is a limited resource, prioritising long-term storage leads to greater system-wide impact. Simon and Tobias discuss the implications of SAF blending–the current EU aviation mandate–and alternatives that deliver equal climate benefit.
“We suggest... that this should be allowed as part of the toolbox when aviation and airline companies are obligated to blend in e-fuel. Let them achieve the same climate benefit by capturing CO₂ from the atmosphere and storing it permanently underground—at a much lower cost.”
— Tobias Sørensen, Concito
Challenges and trade-offs for decarbonisation
Public funding is a limited resource. Considering recent public tenders, Simon and Tobias discuss which pathways to prioritise for a cost-effective toolkit. Important factors considered for effectiveness include operating hours, infrastructure life span, and decarbonisation alternatives. A few stand-outs for optimal carbon capture and permanent storage include cement, waste-to-energy using non-fossil sources (BECCS), and biogas. But, considering the reliance on voluntary purchases today, Simon addresses one challenge of private support: companies choosing certifiable credits over technically-efficient ones.
Another challenge lies in sustainable biomass scaling. With demand across multiple sectors (CDR, materials, hydrogen, biodiversity, food), land reallocation becomes crucial. Tobias suggests reducing meat consumption could support strategies like biochar and reforestation.
Nordic CO₂ Storage Developments
With a few notable storage plants online in the Nordics, more are being explored. These early projects are expensive but essential for de-risking value chains and learning-by-doing. Simon and Tobias highlight the role that onshore storage in Denmark could play, as a cost-effective option when compared to todays price ranges.
Voluntary buyers play a crucial early role but are not sufficient to sustain market growth alone. Wide-spread recognition for carbon storage solutions, whether captured at source or removal, as a highly beneficial and effective solution must continue.
“It’s a tool we have in our climate solutions toolbox. And when we do modelling around the scarce resources we have—the limited economic resources—the cost-effectiveness proves that for certain sectors, even something as expensive as DAC is part of the solution.”
—Simon Bager, Co-founder of Klimate
Implications and Recommendations
Beyond increased traction to removal and storage in voluntary markets, stronger policies are needed to funnel climate finance. Today’s EU ETS and it’s potential inclusion of negative emissions is a step forward to drive adoption. But, current price-levels of removal and storage are misaligned with ETS cost-per-tonne. The market needs contracts for addressing this difference, public-private co-investment, and coordinated procurement strategies.
CDR is not a license to delay reductions but a vital climate tool for hard-to-abate sectors like aviation. Decisions today—on policy, investment, and market design—will shape the effectiveness and equity of future carbon strategies.
Discover the news shaping the future of carbon removal.

Carbon credits & credence goods with Donna Lee │ What goes up must come down, Episode 2
Heading 1
Heading 2
Heading 3
Heading 4
Heading 5
Heading 6
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Block quote
Ordered list
- Item 1
- Item 2
- Item 3
Unordered list
- Item A
- Item B
- Item C
Bold text
Emphasis
Superscript
Subscript

Why invest in both long and short term carbon removal solutions?
Heading 1
Heading 2
Heading 3
Heading 4
Heading 5
Heading 6
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Block quote
Ordered list
- Item 1
- Item 2
- Item 3
Unordered list
- Item A
- Item B
- Item C
Bold text
Emphasis
Superscript
Subscript

Net zero strategy – what is it, and what does it include?
Heading 1
Heading 2
Heading 3
Heading 4
Heading 5
Heading 6
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Block quote
Ordered list
- Item 1
- Item 2
- Item 3
Unordered list
- Item A
- Item B
- Item C
Bold text
Emphasis
Superscript
Subscript
Sign up for Klimate Insights
Every second month we'll send you an update on all things Klimate, carbon removal, and the most important emerging news and policy.
Talk to a carbon removal strategist
Finding the right way to remove your CO₂ emissions can seem overwhelming. Our team is here to help. Book a meeting to walk through how our solution might fit your needs.